Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Piltdown Hoax


The Piltdown hoax is one of the biggest frauds known in scientific history. It took place in a small village called Piltdown in the town of Lewes located in Southern England in the year 1912. An amateur archeologist from Sussex England named Charles Dawson had received a primitive skull from one of his laborers who had discovered it. Dawson was already building a reputation for himself within the scientific community and became an opportunist when he realized that the ancient skull that the laborer had found could catapult him to elite status within the academic society. He was very enthusiastic about making spectacular discoveries and he would go to any length to accomplish doing so even if he had to fool the world in the process. Dawson had forged the skull found at Piltdown and claimed that it was the so called missing link that would connect humans and apes, and in the process put Britain on the map in regards to having ancient hominid history His hoax went undiscovered for forty years until scientific technology improved ..

Scientist are well respected individuals and scholars and a hoax played on the scientific world by one of their own would be the last thing you expect a scientist to do. Scientist were outraged because of the amount of attention paid to evolution regarding the Piltdown find. It was covetousness and greed that drove Charles Dawson to deceive his colleagues they proclaimed. For forty years people believed that prehistoric man had existed in England and more importantly they believed that the skull was the missing link between humans and apes. Fortunately with the aid of new technology, Dawson’s hoax was exposed in 1953 by a professor named Kenneth Oakley of the British Museum. By using a technique called fluorine analysis, professor Oakley was able to prove that the jaw of the skull that Dawson presented was much younger than the rest of the skull because they contained different levels of fluorine and the amounts of fluorine the skeletal remains had from seepage of groundwater should have been the same considering that they were found at the same site.

Unfortunately it isn’t possible to remove the human factor from science so that such a hoax will never happen again. Human intervention with science is not a bad thing though considering it is us who come up with all the hypothesis, theories, and technologies that continue to advance science as we know it. A lesson to be learned from the Piltdown hoax is never trust anyone’s biased opinions based on their title or academic status and also take heed to any doubt that may surface no matter how small.     

3 comments:

  1. I thought the fluorine test was a way to date the fossils and see if they were as old as they were have thought to have been. It is good to know why this would have dated them or matched the fossils together or declared that they weren't from the same specimen or buried at the same time. I have to agree that you can't remove the humanness from science. Do you think that this same kind of hoax could be pulled off again? Or do you think it wouldn't be possible with today's technology and education?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Careful about speculation on the perpetrator. While Dawson was a logical suspect, we still, to this day, don't know who actually created this hoax. Just the facts, please.

    Also, did you see the section in the guidelines that said not to use "missing link" as the significance of this find? Did you review that material in the assignment folder? What was the actual significance of this find? Had it been valid, what would it have taught us about how humans evolved? Good note on the fact that this put England "on the map" but there was more importance to this find than English pride.

    What faults were involved in this hoax? Missing this section.

    Very good discussion on the fluorine analysis, but what about the process of science itself helped to uncover the hoax? Why were scientists still analyzing this fossil some 40 years after it's discovery?

    Good analysis on the human factor issue and well done on the conclusion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I honestly feel that your answers were right on point and made sense. In the end your comment about how we should not really trust anyones opinions or there assumptions i could agree with just because someone has a title doesn't mean there telling the truth. we should never forget that no matter what that greed and to be envious, which is in human nature its something that ever human has whether its just a little bit or not.

    ReplyDelete